I was reading an EFF article advocating free open wifi for all and it got me thinking. When did people get the idea that internet should be free? Certainly it wasn’t from working at an ISP, getting peering, negotiating bandwidth pricing, buying gear, leasing fiber… Having done all of the above, let me rant! (Ok so I’m ranting about broadband quotas and torrent throttling like always)

Let’s say I buy a full non-burstable gigabit link from one of the cheaper telcos like Cogent or Level 3. Depending on your market, you will end up paying $4-8/megabit for it. Thats not including termination, port fees, the hardware required to route it, cost of transport (i.e. your fiber conduit rental) , etc and those things can certainly add up to 5-20% of the total cost, but for the sake of simplification we’ll ignore them. 1 gigabit, when run to the horrible limit (resulting in very unhappy customers) is 328, 718 gigabytes/month of actual data moved, and frankly is a lot of traffic in any sense. (Lets leave peering out of this discussion, the larger an ISP the more of their footprint they can get through peering, but it really doesn’t help the independents and even mid-sized guys without international fiber to meet in lots of POPs and IXs)

Now presume I don’t want to oversell it what so ever. I want to sell enterprise grade DSL to businesses who demand a reasonable 10mbps guaranteed. This is a very common scenario. If I split my gigabit link up to 10megabit customers, the most I can fit on it and guarantee their performance is 100 customers. If we take our cost to buy just the transit, ignoring any of the related costs, we’re going to run $40-80/customer. Tack on termination of the DSL/cable (hardware, very expensive), lines to the customer (very very expensive) and of course support, you are looking at easily 2x that cost. While a business will have no trouble stomaching this cost+ profit for us, a consumer obviously will not.

This is where over-selling comes in. If I assume that my 10 megabit users will use roughly 50 gigabytes per month of data, that means I can fit in 6400 subscribers onto that link. (Nobody would run their links at 100%, this would add at least 20-30% to the total cost of bandwidth to buy overhead, but we’ll ignore it for simplification sake) 6400 subscribers, each now are only using a dollar or so of our transit, and with support, hardware and line costs fixed, we can sell the service for $40, cover our costs and make profit. Yes profit. People seem to forget, a company needs to make profit or its share holders will terminate them. Profit is not evil or crooked.

This all worked great in the early 2000s. Bandwidth was cheap, space and power to build telecom sites was cheap, and fiber transport was nearly free. Bandwidth is still cheap, but everything else has gone up an arm and a leg. None of that really matters though, because the real problem is that we don’t use the internet like we did 10 years ago. Who can stand to watch Youtube or Netflix at less than 720p? How many households have a kid (adult) running BitTorrent all the time? And really, who wants a sub-25 megabit link nowadays?

Providers cannot oversell at the levels they did even 5 years ago. While we may say boo hoo why do I care what XYZ evil company makes (not fair, remember these are people working like anyone else), remember we also want startup and new ISPs to compete. They have it even rougher as their cost/subscriber is higher.

Basically it comes down to this. The cost to provide internet, in North America, has not gotten massively cheaper, but per capita we are using much much more. In order for providers to maintain their levels of overselling they are imposing quotas and throttling p2p. People hate quotas and DPI, but trust me, people hate rate increases more. Yes it would be totally cool if we all had gigabit fiber to the doorstep, but sadly this is a huge undertaking, and companies like Rogers or Bell is going to invest in it, wide spread, only to have the government force them to let other providers use the links/equipment at cost. It’s not in the private sector’s best interest to do this. (typo fixed ;) thanks everyone!)

So yea, we have out dated infrastructure since we put it in much earlier than say Asia and Europe. I think, the real solution is for the government to step in and use tax dollars to improve it (OMG, I can’t believe I said that) if we really want deregulated residential internet. Run fiber to the homes, maintain it, charge providers at-cost to use it, and yea we’ll have great competitive internet again.

Yes I advocated for publicly funded internets, I must need coffee.

…better than the western main stream media do to adults. Brilliant, and quite accurate.



via Sarah

So my security related opposition to the G20 was proved very valid. Things got much worse down here in the financial and shopping districts of Toronto that I even imagined though…

Early in the afternoon on Saturday June 26th, all of the peaceful protests were in full swing in downtown Toronto. Despite having what I was told as 10,000+ police officers in the downtown core, a small group of several hundred protesters managed to break away from the marches and began rioting on Yonge St. They destroyed businesses in the name of hurting multi-nationals, Starbucks were a preferred target. Never the less they destroyed and looted many locally-owned stores like the iconic Zanzibar strip club an independent jewler on Yonge. Destruction was wreaked up Yonge from King to College for over an hour before police showed up. Where were the police? The only police I saw were cop cars on fire… Store after store was vandalized, peoples livelihoods destroyed, all afternoon and into the evening.

To put things in perspective for people: they literally hit every store I frequent on a daily / weekly basis (aside from our grocery store which is a bit east of the riots), and I’d been to every Starbucks destroyed, and there were many… Thankfully the Eaton Center was quickly put on lock down to prevent rioting, and for that I am grateful. Apparently anarchists are opposed to people like themselves being employed in the retail and hospitalities industries, because they surely will cause a lot of closures while places pick up the pieces this week… (Yea, guess what, destroying a Starbucks hurts more than just Starbucks Inc. in Seattle)

It hurts me that people would be chanting ‘Our Streets!’ while trashing my city. That riot was a few blocks from my home, on my street, and along my walk to work. There is absolutely no chance these people are downtown Toronto residents, financial district, south of Lakeshore or otherwise. These are not their streets, they have destroyed my neighbourhood. Many people suggests they were bussed in from long distances, specifically Montreal. (Google and Twitter searches on pro-anarchist hash tags have lead me to believe a lot of this anti-G20/anti-capitalism support comes from there as well, not to single them out though…)

There were more such incidents, specifically one on Queen near Spadina in the evening that involving more torched police cars going unchecked for large periods of time from law enforcement. The area near the fence was completely secure, even over night, but rioting went near unchecked across our downtown core. I am very disappointed in our poor security effort, though it was a near unfathomable task by hosting it in Toronto. See my other article on this subject…

The protesters look mostly like white trash. Lots of these so-called “anarchists” look predictably like angry older teens and 20-somethings. If they have an agenda to push, they are stupid beyond words; but I strongly believe they are just angry kids wreaking havoc by trashing property. What it says about our society I don’t know, but it sure is sad. Thankfully many of these protesters and even the so called Black Bloc protesters were photoed, often changing out of their black masks, thanks to journalists doing their part. Publish all the photos, black list these sociopaths.

Aside from the actual protesters, there were huge amounts of onlookers, who I am also disgusted with. Crowds of people supporting the rioters but not causing damage themselves, crowds of people with cameras (the small DRebel-esque SLRs seemed very popular) and cell phone cameras standing around photoing destruction in the city disgust me. Nobody aside from an elderly security guard seemed to try and stop the rioting. Are we that apathetic as a society? I even saw a lot of people smiling at the chaos, even if they were only there taking photos. That too is sociopathic behaviour, and is disgusting. These people should be prosecuted as well.

Violence went on over night, though nothing as organized. Trains, subways and even most surface transit is closed still. Hopefully today will be better than yesterday, but I’m not that hopeful. I am saddened by the state of society that caused this havoc, and the people too apathetic to do anything but snap photos for Twitter. Now we have massive damage from King to Bloor, pretty much everywhere between Spadina and Jarvis.

Harper government who put the G20 in *downtown Toronto*: Terrible.  Toronto police who focused too much on protecting the fence and not the rioting: Unacceptable. The human beings who would destroy other peoples property in the name of a political agenda? The worst of all. You people do not deserve the civil and human rights you obviously take for granted in this country.

So again I’ve been slacking on blog posting, but things have been busy. We’d been working on getting a very large and rather-out-of-our-comfort-zone (tech-wise) campaign for the last few weeks. It’s definitely been fun and thankfully the craziness had subsided this week. Onto the matter at hand!

So the G20 summit has descended into Toronto. It does not make me happy for several reasons. The city spent the last several weeks erecting giant fences around Front Street West, around York, Bay and Yonge, around the Westin Harbour Castle, and preparing to close all of the Gardiner off ramps in the area, as well as lanes on Lakeshore. Unfortunately we are smack dab in the middle of it.

So the first issue as far as I’m concerned is the disruption of it all.  Anyone working in that zone, was pretty much let off work unless they were essential. Certainly for many workers especially those working the Front St hospitalities this meant lost wages for 1-3 days. Anyone working in the downtown core, or even commuting through via the TTC or GO was suggested to take the days off, work from home, etc, due to delays, protests, etc. More lost wages surely, and more importantly, massive loss of productivity. So the near $2 billion (I believe) they spent on the summit doesn’t even scratch the surface of nixing Toronto’s productivity and tourism for 3 days. Bad enough.

Anyone brave enough to drive into the city may have been met with random full 427 and Gardiner closures as dignitaries came through. I’m told this was going on even earlier in the week as well since many arrived early. More disruption to massive numbers of people’s lives, many whom live and work very far from the summit. Mind you, if you already were downtown, the roads were empty as nobody had any way to even get off the highway around here :) I’d have done some rallying around the once-in-a-lifetime empty downtown core if the police wouldn’t have shot me. Toronto G20 Supecial Rally Stage-o, fighto!

Why put it *downtown* Toronto? Why not put it out by the airport? Easier to get to *from the airport* Why not leave it in Huntsville (where the G8 was)? Sorry to the Huntsville and airport’ians but the disruptions to productivity, wages and lives would have been minimized.

So my second issue with the G20 here was security. I’m not really sure who the security effort was tailored to stop. Today is the day of the biggest protests, and its estimated to be under 10,000 (unlike Montreal’s 50,000, I’m not sure what that says about Montreal), which is almost half the number of police downtown for the G20. Certainly the protestors stand no chance of… disrupting anything. They are just masochists who dream of getting 15 minutes of fame from a news program. The only risk is that commuters and tourists may get caught in the scuffle, hospitals were ramping up just incase…

I assume the other thing that the massive security budget was for was to stop potential terrorist attacks. Of course having Obama here (and others) you are immediately running the risk of having a terrorist attack, domestic or international. This bothers me because you’ve immediately put the people and businesses at risk in the most dense area in Canada! Anyone commuting through Union Station, or even living here where we are, is at risk of some sort of attack. Frankly, if someone had wanted to do something, they could have snuck something or themselves into any of the buildings next to the Convention Center earlier in the week. 151 Front Street W included. Unless I’m mistaken, police did not sweep datacenters, filled with the property and equipment of tens of thousands of unknown individuals (many of whom are from overseas). Not that I’m trying to give ideas to the terroristas, but these are people willing to die for what they believe in, they are pretty dedicated and don’t need tips from a tech blogger. Just as someone who has worked in the area for years, I’m saying it would be trivial even with the big scary fences and police presence.

So my other problem with security is that our government rather silently took away some of our civil liberties during the summit anywhere near the fence to. Too bad on my walk for *coffee* I pass the fence as does anyone who uses Union Station. Better be ready to submit to search and seizure if they don’t like how you look. Thankfully they did not attempt to take my camera when I visited it, but I was certainly escorted off by 5 officers for taking photos. Scariest bit: The regulation also says that if someone has a dispute with an officer and it goes to court “the police officer’s statement under oath is considered conclusive evidence under the act.” Thank god this is only 3 days… but seriously Canada, you are regressing! Again, the government is certainly not acting with the will of the people in mind.

So as far as I can tell, security would have been cheaper and easier *anywhere* other than downtown Toronto. Lot’s of nearby tall buildings, tall buildings that have lots of places to hide a person or tool of evil. The risk to the population of downtown is the highest anywhere in Canada because we are the most dense, and the risk to businesses is highest because this is where all the commerce (and telecommunications!) are. What the hell was going through the heads of the Harper government when they chose downtown Toronto?

The choice of downtown Toronto does not benefit anybody. If Canada really had to host the G20 (and that’s a geopolitical question for people other than myself), why the hell would you host it downtown?  By the aiport, in Huntsville (like the G8 from earlier in the week), ANYWHERE would have been better than here. By putting it here you ensure that you disrupt the most peoples lives, most people’s livelihoods, and put the most people at risk, by increasing the cost of security dramatically, while lowering the effectiveness of you security.

It’s early in the morning, I’ll likely revise the grammar of this post when I’m more awake, but fuck the Harper Government anyway.